Skip to content

Asylum Essay

Joanna LU 44655185 10/04/15 ASSIGNMENT 2: INTEGRATIVE SUMMARY Treatments towards asylum seeker and refugees in Australia have slowly come to light as frequent incidents of mistreatment have been recorded and publicised. These include poor living conditions and neglected medical attention and that when compared to animals, it is said that animals have it better (Burnside, 2014). This reveals a prominent gap between Australia’s Human rights obligation under international law and the current treatment towards asylum seekers and refugees (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2013). However, Australia has taken significant steps towards the issue by developing systems which support the Commission’s recommendations and international immigration detention network (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2013). The detentions in Australia constantly breach the United Nations Human Rights Committee’s (UNHRC) human rights obligation causing negative effects to develop within the asylum seekers and refugees placed there. The Snapshot report by the Australian Human Rights Commission (2013) stated that under UNHRC human rights obligations all persons to be detained are to be treated with humanity and respect for their inherent dignity (AHRC, 2013, pp. 7). However, in December 2012 UNHCR discovered that the conditions in both Nauru and Manus were overcrowding, harsh and unsatisfactory causing depression and other health issues (AHRC, 2013, pp. 17). Similarly, Burnside (2014) revealed that once refugees landed on Australian grounds, the first thing they were to do was to attend the Immigration department interview disregarding whether they were covered in their own faeces and/or urine. The outcome of treating refugees and asylum seekers in this manner, defies the obligation of being treated humanely as their personal hygiene was completely disregarded causing them to become prone to diseases and illness (AHRC, 2013). Furthermore, in the Burnside (2014) article, a detention centre on Christmas Island neglected its duty to continue supplying essential hygiene necessities such as pads causing one female with a bladder problem to suffer from extreme embarrassment and discomfort. This behaviour rejects the human rights obligation of being entitled to enjoy the highest attainable standard of mental and physical health (AHRC, 2013). The lack of proper medical attention (Burnside, 2014) also plays a part with the high numbers of suicides, self-harming and depression within Australian detentions (AHRC, 2013). Likewise, the Australian Human Rights Commission (2013) stated that the detentions in Australia have a high number of asylum seekers and refugees who are diagnosed with a mental disorder and receive no proper counselling and medical attention. The notion of animals having better rights than the refugees and asylum seekers detained in Australian detentions prove to be true as cases such the Reza Barati are left aside with no legal actions being implemented (Burnside, 2014). Therefore, with these countless records of mistreatment in Australian detentions, it is evident that the treatment towards refugees and asylum seekers detained in Australia rejects those obligations specified by the UNHRC. This reveals that Australian detentions supply nothing but negativity and that it’s “a human right catastrophe with no end in sight” (Burnside, 2014). On the other hand, improvements such as issues concerning health and hygiene are slowly being implemented. In the snapshot report by the AHRC (2013), the Departments have taken steps to improve and strengthen the mental health services across the immigration detention networks. Furthermore, Australia has decided to step towards carrying out a system of community placements on the mainland for asylum seekers and refugees. These include building permanent facilities within Manus Island and Lorengau which are planned to commence to accommodate the tight amount of stable and hygienic detentions (AHRC, 2013). The notion of this has been achieved through the use of bridging visas and building on methods introduced by succeeding Australian Governments (AHRC, 2013). Additionally, Australia has decided to step towards carrying out a system of the constant need for regular immigration monitoring and hence this has notion been heightened within the detentions in Joanna LU 44655185 10/04/15 Nauru and Manus to ensure that the conditions meet UNHRC human rights obligation (AHRC, 2013). The AHRC (2013) also reveals that the necessity of individually assessing detained people taking into consideration their circumstances which include their health and situation. Burnside (2014) suggests that refugees and asylum seekers should be receiving treatment similar to those of animals due to Australian animals having more rights than the refugees and asylum seekers in Australia. These include penalties for not following the UNHRC human rights obligations which include human hygiene and appropriate medical attention. However, due to the subjective nature of the issues regarding to the treatment towards asylum seekers and refugees, implementing these changes may take a sufficient amount of time (AHRC, 2013). All in all, the current treatments of Australian refugees and asylum seekers such as abusing their right to have proper medical attention and the right to have be in an appropriate hygienic environment contradicts those obligations provided by the UNHRC. By doing this, Australia has one of the highest suicide rates as well was the exponential amount of refugees and asylum seekers diagnosed with mental disorders. However, the Australian government has slowly taken steps to make sure that the detained are exposed to proper UNHRC regulations such as constant supplies of necessities and the strengthening of medical centres. Reference List: Australian Human Rights Commission. (2013). ‘Asylum seekers, refugees and human rights’. Retrieved from http://www.humanrights.gov.au, pp.4.20 Burnside, J. (2014). ‘In Australia animals have better rights than asylum seekers.’ Retrieved from http://theconversation.com

Help

Asylum Seekers Persuasive Essay

658 WordsJun 10th, 20123 Pages

Asylum seekers have been escaping their hostile countries for decades now, but where are they fleeing to? Not to Australia. With the Australian government forcing asylum seekers to Thailand and other foreign countries, it is lessening the number we, as Australians, have to "deal with", at least that is the government’s plan. Many Australians believe that asylum seekers and refugees don't deserve to come here to Australia, however if those Australians were to be forced to flee Australia due to war, they would support them coming. The point being made is that asylum seekers deserve as much as any Australian. Australia is a free country, and we want the entire world to believe that, so why are we trying to relieve asylum seekers of the joy of…show more content…

More often than not, we argue the question: What is normal? I can assure you it's not the way we are treating asylum seekers. Not only is it inhumane, it is racist. Just because they come from a country that isn't thriving like our own, we must treat them like dirt beneath our feet?
Just think about the term detention centres. The definition of detention is "a state of being confined after one's acts of misbehaviour", or as we like to think of it, staying after school when everyone's gone home as a punishment for misbehaving. But can you list three things asylum seekers have done wrong? Neither can I. I don't feel anyone could, because they are simply innocent people who have had an unfortunate lifestyle. They save up their life savings to pay for an uncertain boat trip which could easily have them killed with the same percentage of living. It's a 50/50 chance, yet they are so desperate, they will literally do anything to get out of their country, even if it’s illegal. They come on these boats, promised a good life on the other end of the trip, with nothing but the clothes on their backs and we're supposed to just sit back watch as they die in detention centres?
So I ask you: If you were a refugee and had nowhere to go, wouldn’t you be fleeing to the safest country in the world? I know I would

Show More